← All explainers
HB 1117Introduced; filed Nov. 12, 202690th Regular Session (2027)

Insurance clauses that force arbitration before you can sue would no longer hold up in Texas

What it does

HB 1117 would void a binding arbitration clause in a property and casualty insurance policy if it makes you take the dispute to arbitration before you can use the courts, waives or limits your rights, damages, attorney's fees, or other remedies available under Texas law, shortens a time limit that Texas law sets, requires arbitration to happen outside Texas for a Texas resident, or charges an arbitration fee much higher than the filing fee in a district court. An agreement to arbitrate an insurance dispute would be enforceable only if it is made after the dispute arises, is signed separately by all parties, and gives everyone equal rights, procedures, and remedies. The new rules would apply to insurance contracts delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2028, and the act takes effect September 1, 2027.

What it means for your community

If you disagree with your property and casualty insurer, this would make it easier to take the dispute to court instead of being sent to a private arbitrator you did not pick. It would also keep a dispute from being pushed out of Texas and stop clauses that preserve court rights only for the insurer. Local judges could see more insurance disputes that used to go to private arbitration.

Have an opinion on HB 1117?

Your lawmaker's office counts calls. Find yours and call in under a minute.

Call your lawmaker about HB 1117
Read the full bill on Texas Legislature Online

Free weekly email

Get the Tuesday email

One short, plain-English recap of what the Legislature did last week. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

We describe legislation. We do not endorse or oppose it. If you spot an error, tell us and we will correct it.